Khashan Hammers Norton, Too

Last year, I wrote a scathing review of Augustus Richard Norton’s book, Hezbollah. Hilal Khashan from the American University of Beirut agrees with me. Writing in the latest Middle East Quarterly , Khashan notes that Norton’s book “fails miserably. Norton summarily dismisses Hezbollah’s terrorist credentials… and…ignores the organic linkage amoung Hezbollah and Iran’s Islamic Republic.” Khashan concludes: “Norton’s book is the literary equivalent of antifreeze laced Chinese toothpaste. Has

Original post by Jonathan Schanzer

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • Fark
  • Furl
  • Netscape
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
Related Articles
  • Boston University’s Terrorist Apologist Coddles Hamas, Too
  • Prof. Abraham Miller on BU’s Hezbollah Apologist
  • A Tale of Two Hezbollah Book Reviews
  • What Readers Can Do About BU’s Hezbollah Apologist
  • BU President Weak on Hezbollah Apologist
  • No comments yet. Be the first.

    Leave a reply