Census Discrepancies
In Exodus 30:11-16 there is a census taken, and the number of men by the age of 20 were counted at 603,550 (as specified ibid 38:26). Now, in Numbers 1:46 we see that another census was taken several months later, and that the count was precisely identical to the previous one (603,550). How could it be that there was no change whatsoever by that moment? Not a individual person had their 20th birthday in amoung the two censuses!
Rashi asks that very interesting question in his commentary on Exodus 30:16. He says that a person’s age changed not on the instance of birth, but rather on Rosh Hashana – the Jewish new year. Therefore, prior to the first census, men became 19 on Rosh Hashana, and they remained that way until the next Rosh Hashana. However, the second census took place before the next Rosh Hashana! Therefore, all 19 year olds remained as such for both the first and second census.
But Nachmanides (ibid verse 12) does not accept that. Firstly, he says that one’s age changes on the term of birth, not Rosh Hashana. Additionally, a number of public must have died in within the first and second census! Rather, there is an exact correlation within both censuses due to the fact that, in amidst the two countings, precisely the right number of folks grew up to age 20 to replace those that died.
Alternatively, Nachmanides posits that the eligibility criterion for the two censuses were different. Although the
These are very unlikely coincidences! I think we see from Nachmanides that the censuses were not random; they were carefully engineered (by G-d) to produce precisely the unmistaken numbers. Indeed, after forty years in the desert, the final count in Numbers 26:51 additionally produces (close to) the same number, though the population count of many tribes changed very significantly by that day. The entire nation of Israel was basically held in stasis during those 40 years.
Azriel Schreiber
Original post by ATR
No comments yet. Be the first.
Leave a reply




























