Bollinger could not have said it better . He delivered a searing, no-holds barred condemnation of Ahmedinejad personally and of his policies.. His language was direct and unflinching. He left nothing out.

Someone describe it as an ambush. I totally agree. Ahmadinejad didn’t know what hit him. In reality he did, and complained about “the wave of insults” and said that it was no way to treat a guest whom you have invited.

Ahmadinejad was a flop, totally. He rambled through most of it and said nothing. He refused to say whether he wanted the end of Israel but he

spent most of his duration to condemn Israel and to compose the point that “Palestinians” should hold a referendum. By “Palestinians” he meant all folks, Jews, Christians and Arabs in the territories and in Israel. He used the term “Palestinian Jews” Thereby denying the existence of the State of Israel.

What he was describing was a one-state solution in which all Arab refugees would be included. Thus the Arabs would have a majority and Israel would cease to exist.

Coatsworth who asked the questions was totally tongue tied and inept.

Ahmedinejad, Bollinger, Israel

Original post by Ted Belman