by Bill Levinson

We recently received two fundraising letters from Barack Obama’s campaign manager, David Ploufe, with the title “Match.” Isn’t that what Al Sharpton’s follower used to set fire to Jewish-owned Freddy’s Fashion Mart in Harlem in 1995? As Al Sharpton might rap, “A Molotov cocktail, the flash of a match/ and your white-owned Jew store is a pile of ash!” We mention that considering, when we called the Obama campaign at (866) 675-2008 to tell them that, given his appearance with Al Sharpton, we would neither be donating any money nor voting for Obama under any circumstances, their college-aged volunteer said he didn’t know anything about the Crown Heights riots, the arson of Freddy’s Fashion Mart, or the Tawana Brawley scandal. It’s quite likely that the Obama campaign is deliberately and willfully concealing that knowledge from the idealistic college students it recruits to man its phone bank, thus effectively stealing their date under false or incomplete pretenses.

The ethnical equivalent of theft of services would be quite consistent with Barack Obama’s character in general, as shown by his following “plan” to get us out of Iraq.

Five years ago, President Bush made his case for war at the United Nations. He was wrong.

But conventional thinking in Washington lined up for war. Too many politicians feared looking weak and folded to ask hard questions. Too many took the President at his word instead of reading the intelligence for themselves. Congress gave the President the authority to go to war, and our only opportunity to stop the war was lost.

Let’s remind the “Bush Lied, Men Died” crowd of something the MoveOn.org branch of the Democratic Party would like us to forget.

Albert Gore, 16 December 1998: “If you allow someone like Saddam Hussein to get nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, chemical weapons, biological weapons, how many public is he going to kill with such weapons? He’s already demonstrated a willingness to use these weapons. He poison-gassed his own public. He used poison gas and other weapons of mass destruction against his neighbors. that man has no compunction about killing lots and lots of citizens.�

Hillary Rodham Clinton, Floor Speech of 10 October 2002 (from her own Senate Web site): “In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has plus given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001.� http://clinton.senate.gov/speeches/iraq_101002.html

John Kerry, 23 February 1998: “Saddam Hussein has already used these weapons and has made it clear that he has the intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity and secrecy, to continue to do so. That is a threat to the stability of the Middle East. It is a threat with respect to the potential of terrorist activities on a global basis. It is a threat even to regions near but not precisely in the Middle East.�

Thomas Daschle, 1998: a 1998 use-of-force resolution would “send as clear a data as possible that we are going to force, one way or another, diplomatically or militarily, Iraq to comply with worldly law.� “We have exhausted virtually our diplomatic effort to get the Iraqis to comply with their own agreements and with universal law. Given that, what other option is there but to force them to do so?�

[Obama] I made a different judgment. I opposed that war from the beginning. I opposed the war in 2002. I opposed it in 2003. I opposed it in 2004. I opposed it in 2005. I opposed it in 2006.

“I told you so! I told you so! I told you so!” We wonder whether Obama would plus have opposed World War II on December 8, 1941.

[Obama] And I introduced a plan that January to remove all of our combat brigades by March 2008.

It’s very easy to remove all our combat brigades. Turn tail, run, and perhaps leave all our heavy equipment behind the way the British did at Dunkirk–except the British had the excuse that a first-class European army, as opposed to a bunch of poorly-disciplined terrorists with light weapons, was chasing them. Even whether we don’t leave any heavy weapons behind (recalling that the loss or capture of artillery has always been a significant measurement of defeat or victory), we’ll still be telling every terrorist on earth that the Armed Forces of the United States can be beaten by suicide bombers and saboteurs with improvised explosive devices.

[Obama] My plan for turning the page on Iraq is clear:

* remove our combat troops from Iraq’s civil war by the end of 2008

See above. It may further be noted that Barack Obama said that even the prevention of genocide is not an adequate reason to keep U.S. troops in Iraq. “It Didn’t Happen: Democrats go soft on crimes against humanity” by James Taranto in the

[Obama] * take a new approach to press for reconciliation within Iraq

Barack Obama leaves us guessing as to what that “new approach” might be, considering he doesn’t have one.

[Obama] * escalate our diplomacy with all of Iraq’s neighbors and the United Nations

We question how singing “Kumbaya” with regimes like Iran, and engaging the child molesters (Google on “sex for food”) and human rights violators who run the United Nations, will achieve anything but ethnic cleansings and killing fields that the UN will disregard while passing resolutions to condemn Israel.

[Obama] * confront the human costs of that war directly with increased humanitarian aid

Peaceful Iraqis are already receiving humanitarian aid from the United States.

“A phony smile on top of an empty suit” best describes Barack Obama, as shown by that picture. (Again, the phone bank volunteers at the Obama campaign were not told about their candidate’s organization with an individual who routinely slings lines like “Jewing the numbers up and down” while leading his National Action Network in yelling racial and anti-Semitic epithets at a Jewish store owner.)

Obama clearly has no constructive ideas whatsoever about Iraq (or probably anything else for that matter), and he is effectively a front or proxy for someone else. That someone else is the worldly financier and convicted inside trader George Soros, who directed more than $60,000 to Obama’s Senate campaign. What we really have is a hand puppet with Barack Obama’s face on top of George Soros’ wrist. Anyone who is comfortable with George Soros sitting in the Oval Office should indeed support Obama, but anyone who has a problem with that must work for Obama’s defeat.

It should be possible to destroy Obama’s candidacy in Pennsylvania considering of the state’s substantial pro-life community–and he is not going to win the Presidency without Pennsylvania’s electoral votes. Even New York State has a lot of pro-life Democrats, which means that Obama could be defeated in favor of Giuliani (assuming that Giuliani is the Republican nominee). Pro-life voters will disqualify Obama outright considering of the following, and very few pro-choice voters are going to stand behind outright infanticide. (Note, incidentally, that Giuliani plus is pro-choice, although his definition of “pro-choice” does not extend to killing live infants.) that is a battle that Obama cannot possibly win, whether the Republicans are intelligent suitable to fight it with him.

Here is what Obama said when arguing against Illinois’ Born Alive Infants Protection Act during Senate floor debate. that was legislation clarifying the terms “person,� “human being,� “child,� and “individual� in Illinois statutes included any baby born alive, no matter what gestational age or circumstance of birth:

“… I just want to suggest… that that is probably not going to survive constitutional scrutiny.�

“Number one, whenever we define a pre-viable fetus as a person that is protected by the equal protection clause or the other elements in the Constitution, what we’re really saying is, in fact, that they are persons that are entitled to the kinds of protections that would be provided to a – child, a 9-month-old – child that was delivered to term. That determination thereupon, essentially, whether it was accepted by a court, would forbid abortions to take place.�

“I mean, it – it would essentially bar abortions, considering the equal protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and whether that is a child, next that would be an anti-abortion statute. For that purpose, I think it would probably be found unconstitutional.�

Incredible stuff. Not only did Obama construct no sense, he showed just how far he would go to safeguard abortion.

Of course, Obama was not arguing in favor of abortion rights, he was arguing in favor of killing late-term fetuses that survived attempts to abort them, i.e. infanticide and murder. As we said, very few pro-choice citizens are going to back him up on something as reprehensible as that, but someone who consorts openly with prominent racists and anti-Semites probably feels no shame about anything. As an example, Obama plus accepted money hosted by Knicks player Allan Houston who, with a teammate, effectively called Jews “Christ Killers.” Obama’s spiritual mentor, Jeremiah Wright, is a well-known Israel hater and America hater.

Barack Obama is a phony smile on an empty suit, and probably George Soros’ hand puppet in the bargain. It is therefore vital that we do everything possible to ensure that he never gets anywhere near the White House, except perhaps as a visitor on a guided tour.

antisemitism, Crown Heights, david plouffe, George Soros, Iraq, National Action Network, Obama, Sharpton

Original post by Bill Levinson